Salvaging economic risks through insurance

03 April 2012, Sweetcrude, Lagos – The actions of the Boko Haram sect has led to economic paralysis in some Northern states of the country, however experts are of the opinion that collaboration between the government and the insurance industry can salvage the situation going forward. Rosemary Onuoha reports

As terrorism daily assumes a widening dimension, international reinsurance companies no longer extend reinsurance cover for terrorism to developing economies battling with the menace. The reason for this trend, according to findings, is that these international reinsurance firms are of the opinion that most developing economies cannot afford reinsuring their terrorism risks in the international market due to the huge cost involved.

As worrisome as this may seem, experts are insisting that insurance against terrorism is necessary; therefore, countries affected by this development must either choose to combat the rising threat of terrorism or sink with it as the case may be.

In Nigeria, the fear of Boko Haram has adversely crippled economic activities in some Northern states even when the federal government, on daily basis, insists that it is on top of the situation. Even while government claims to be on top of the situation, investigations reveal that there is no concrete insurance plan for providing compensation for loss associated with terrorism. To this end, stakeholders are calling for collaboration between the government and the insurance industry in the fight against terrorism.

Chairman of New India Assurance Company Limited, Mr. Annur Sekar said that terrorism is a serious cause for concern in Nigeria, as such, the insurance industry must wake up to the challenge with the full support of the government.

Chairman of Nigerian Insurers Association, NIA, Mr. Olusola Ladipo-Ajayi , stated that with collaboration between all stakeholders, terrorism can be defeated.

For the Former Managing Director of Financial Institutions Training Centre, FITC, Mr. Oladimeji Alo, there is no better time for terrorism insurance to be put in place than now.

Also said “A sound understanding of the Nigerian environment should propel the government to embrace insurance to guard against losses which could emanate from terrorism.”

The collaboration
If only the insurance industry can get the backing of the government, Sekar said that operators in the sector can come together and create a terrorism pool.

He said “In India we have gone through similar situations in the past. Following the 911 incident, the overseas market withdrew the terrorism cover to the Indian market. And what we did in India is that we came out with our terrorism pool with the backing of the regulator and we have a reinsurance corporation. The reinsurance company became the pool manager and the rest of the market players became participants. So we started operating a terrorism pool in India and over the years it has become bigger and bigger and it has been able to meet the domestic requirement of the insured. But if the risk is very large, what we do is that we go to the overseas market and try to obtain a standard terrorism policy.

But the pool is working very satisfactorily and I think in Nigeria, something like this can be taught up by the regulator here. The local reinsurance company can become a pool manager and the rest insurers can participate in that pool and we find out that this kind of arrangement works very well and one doesn’t have to look to the outsiders.”

The challenge
As elaborate as the call for collaboration in the fight against terrorism may sound the biggest challenge to the growth of the Nigerian insurance industry is the government itself.
Managing Director of Custodian and Allied Insurance Plc, Mr. Wole Oshin stated “In other economies, government picks on insurance for progress. Unfortunately government in Nigeria doesn’t even know insurance.”

He stressed that the government needs to recognise insurance, adding “A situation where budgets are discussed and insurance industry is not even invited means that government does not understand the importance of insurance. Our primary and fundamental objective as an industry is to stabilise the economy, produce savings and stabilise the risk of government. But government has not looked at insurance because they don’t understand it because if they do, then the will give priority to insurance because. In advanced countries, the government can’t do anything without the insurance industry. They can’t even make policies without insurance. Here insurance is not in the centre stage yet and I think it is a critical thing,” Oshin stated.

For Ladipo-Ajayi, the Nigerian situation is a peculiar one as even the government has refused to take up insurance against security risks.

Ladipo-Ajayi said “The federal government does not even buy terrorism insurance even in oil and gas. Where they have been offered, the federal government of Nigeria has not bought terrorism insurance. So we haven’t started doing terrorism insurance because it is very expensive.”

The NIA Chairman however stated that pressure is on the insurance industry to create a policy for security risks because the issue of terrorism and Boko Haram is taking a new dimension.

The way forward
No doubt, the security challenge in the country has become an issue of concern to all. But while the security agencies are still finding a way to tackle the menace, it is generally agreed that the government has to top up its game.

For Owolabi Salami formerly of GT Assurance, the government must rise up to their responsibility of providing security for all. According to him, government should create a conducive economic and regulatory environment while curbing the recklessness of certain actors in the economy.

For Ladipo-Ajayi, with the unserious attitude of the government towards insurance, Nigerians only have to pray that the current security challenges passes away so that the industry will not have to bother about creating policies for the accompanying risks. “We just pray that this Boko Haram phase will pass by. If it is persistent and people continue to look at the direction of insurance and we continue having enquiries from members of the public, then the insurance market will respond accordingly,” he said.

About the Author

  • Ali

    You are correct in one aecpst but Universal Life Insurance is what some people unfortunately want. They like playing the investment and having life insurance at the same time. Remember that the investment is paid out tax free. I personally do not support this product and have sold one Universal Life Insurance YRT yearly renewable term in my career. What you should realize is that there are two types and the one with level cost is usually cheaper then any other permanent insurance.