“Growth in U.S. tight oil continues to impress as development technology and techniques have yet to mature beyond adolescence,” said Phani Gadde, Senior North America Upstream Analyst for Wood Mackenzie.
To better illustrate, Gadde said additional volumes from Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) will come on stream after 2020, and could add 1.5 to 3 million barrels per day (mb/d) by 2030, up to 25 percent more oil than is being forecasted today. These technologies are in early test phase and not commercial yet, but indicators suggest up to a 100 percent increase in recovery rates.
There are pilot tests that are underway with operators like EOG testing it out in the Eagle Ford adds Gadde. “This is going to happen, like horizontal drilling and fracking, leading to another step-change in production technology,” added Skip York Principal Analyst, Americas Downstream, Midstream & Chemicals for Wood Mackenzie.
Wood Mackenzie’s analysis points out that the debate over whether the U.S. crude oil export ban may be lifted does not fully take technical advances in the development of U.S. tight oil into account.
“Policy makers need to get out in front of the next technological progression to not delay the full benefits,” signaled York. York said if U.S. crude prices fall compared to international benchmarks, e.g., WTI-Brent, policy makers could lift the crude oil export ban to preserve current investment levels. This would result in improving domestic tight oil wellhead margins by approximately $5 per barrel, the margin improvement would then attract additional investment, yielding another 0.35 – 0.45 million barrels per day.
“This environment will attract ever more capital, where every $5 billion invested could yield additional production of nearly 0.4 mb/d over 5 years. However, if the U.S. crude oil export ban remains, excessive production could drive down domestic crude oil prices by more than $30 per barrel versus their international benchmarks. This discount has the effect of stranding barrels in the reservoirs leading to no net change in U.S. tight oil volumes and EOR in core areas might simply push out more expensive volumes from emerging plays”.
Ann-Louise Hittle, Head of Macro Oils for Wood Mackenzie, added a global perspective on the impact of additional tight oil output: “The fact these additional volumes are poised to have an impact after 2020 means the increased U.S. tight oil production above our current forecast is likely to be absorbed without a strong effect on Brent oil prices. This is particularly the case because of potential long-term political risk in key future sources of supply such as Iraq’s.”