NERC okays Discos’ N750 ‘service charge’ on electricity consumers

NERC Chairman, Dr. Sam AmadiOscarline Onwuemenyi

28 October 2014, Sweetcrude, ABUJA –
The Chairman of the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission, Dr. Sam Amadi has maintained that there is nothing illegal about the monthly ‘service charge’ of N750 levied on consumers of electricity by distribution companies (Discos).

Amadi’s position comes amid increasing furor over the mandatory N750 ‘service charge’ imposed by distribution companies in spite of the epileptic power supply to many homes and businesses across the country.

Many electricity consumers have described the charge as illegal and unwarranted, complaining that there was no basis for levying the charge even in situations where power has been non-existent for a particular period.

But, the Chairman of NERC in an interview with Sweetcrude Reports in Abuja, explained that the so-called service or fixed charge was necessary and in accordance with the provisions of the Multi-Year Tariff Order (MYTO) approved by the agency.

According to him, “The service charge is a charge for service. For all utilities, service charge is always applicable. These are costs that are not contingent on consumption. It is different from the maintenance fee that was applied in the past that we decided was illogical and it was banished.

“But service charge is the cost of getting connected to the network. In this type of industry there is what is called sunk cost, that is, cost that is fixed. For example, a media organization may decide to acquire a press and whether or not newsprint is available for production does not change the fact that a press has already been acquired, as such it has to be depreciated so the debt can be serviced.”

He further explained, “Today, we are talking about gas being a problem in this country. Let’s assume that some entreprenuers have built their power plants with borrowed funds but could not have it powered due to lack of gas. Instead of generating, say, 800 megawatts, they could only generate 200 megawatts, only the fixed cost (service charge) would help them recover the already invested capital.

“The variable cost is what is dependent on your power consumption. However, if supply gets much more reliable, you will discover that the fixed charge component will reduce dramatically to the point that it will fizzle out into a monthly charge.”

The NERC boss pointed out that in countries with more stable power supply like the United States, for example, they do not use the prepaid system but depend on monthly charges and all the other charges including the service charge is incorporated into the bill.

Amadi, however, sympathized with the electricity consumers who do not necessarily use electricity within a period and still have to pay the charges, even as he promised that the Commission was currently looking into ways to mitigate the impact on consumers.

“We understand that where power is unstable, some consumers may not have power supply for perhaps a week or more and yet be compelled to pay the monthly service charge. In a situation like this, they will certainly feel oppressed,” he stated.

Against the wishes of the distribution countries NERC had a few years ago announced the discontinuation maintenance fees charged to consumers of electricity, which invariably reduced the monthly tariff paid by consumers across the country.

According to officials of the Commission, the Discos no longer have justification for charging the maintenance fee since such a charge is adequately covered by the MYTO review of that period.

Before the review, DISCOs were permitted to charge certain fees including the Meter Maintenance Fund, which were aimed to help them shore up their limited funding. However, the latest MYTO review appears to have taken care of such funding, making any additional charge a burden on the consumers.

Last July’s MYTO review for the electricity sector was met with protests in some quarters due to the poor state of electricity supply in the country, with many claiming that the resultant hike would further worsen the economic gloom of Nigerians. NERC officials then argued that review was long overdue since it had been proposed by the previous administration.

Dr. Amadi expressed sympathy with electricity consumers when he charged that there has been little or no difference in the state of power supply in the country since the power reform was initiated by the Chief Olusegun Obasanjo government in 2005.

Amadi explained that Commission was in the process of consulting with stakeholders over the need or otherwise to increase electricity tariff in the country. He urged the stakeholders to be objective over the review process, noting that, “Public power supply in the country is still a standby in most homes and offices, as it was in 2005 when the reform in the sector began.”

He added that, “The state of electricity generation in this country is so terrible that one patriotic duty of every Nigerian is to speak strongly and critically about what needs to be done to review the situation. To us at the Commission, there cannot be a better time than now to put issues plaguing the sector back on the front burner. It comes as the Federal government is on the verge of divesting sole ownership and control of successor PHCN companies to allow private equity and management in line with the spirit of the Electric Power Sector reform Act, 2005.”

According to Amadi, the general belief in the electricity sector is that current MYTO prices cannot support investments therein as they are much lower than in most developing countries, noting that market imperfections as low generation capacity, low private sector participation, high and unprecedented operating costs and overheads still abound in the industry.

He added that, “As daunting as these challenges seem, we cannot give in to these frustrations if we must succeed. We must confront the pricing challenge while taking into consideration the prevailing economic situation of our country folk.

“For the avoidance of doubt, there is no guarantee whether the tariff will go up or down. It is the outcome of this consultation that will determine where the electricity tariff goes.”

Amadi noted that all over the world, prices have played a dual role in achieving efficiencies in the distribution of goods and services to consumers and in driving private investment into the economy. “Therefore, if we must achieve the goal of giving every citizen access to stable, reliable and fairly-priced electric power, a reliable and sustainable framework must be put in place to ensure the robust interaction of market forces with social policy to attain equilibrium.

“This we can do by establishing a pricing regime that will sustain massive private sector investment and guarantee a positive return on investment, while also being fair to underprivileged consumers,” Amadi stated.

The NERC boss observed that prior to the introduction of MYTO, the industry was characterized by lack of a transparent price determination process and abysmally low tariffs, adding that the PHCN-fixed government-determined tariffs mostly based on the political whims and considerations as opposed to the economic principle of full cost recovery.

“This promoted inefficient pricing of electricity and constrained the ability of government itself to recoup costs of investment. This ultimately undermined the growth potentials of the sector because it totally distorted the economics of the electricity and deferred private sector participation until now,” he stated.

According to him, “MYTO provides for periodic review of the cost parameters through the minor (annual) and major (five-yearly) review windows. The annual review of the framework takes into cognizance changes in gas price, inflation and exchange rates while the major review considers holistic changes in major parameters.”

Amadi pointed out that despite the attributes of MYTO, “the market is yet to become robust. The market has failed to achieve optimum efficiency and milestones as envisaged by the Commission. The much needed private sector investment especially in the distribution sector has not materialized.”

About the Author