19 May 2017, Abuja – The Federal High Court in Abuja has deferred hearing in a legal action instituted by Malabu Oil against the federal government on the ownership of the Oil Prospecting Licence (OPL) 245 otherwise known as Malabu Oil till July 5.
The celebrated law suit involving mainly multinational oil companies was stopped by Justice John Tsoho in Abuja yesterday following the inability of the plaintiffs to serve court processes on one of the major defendants in the suit, Shell Exploration Company.
When the matter was mentioned, counsel to the plaintiffs, Mr. Joseph Achimugu, apologised to the court that proceedings would not be able to go on as scheduled as Shell was only served with the processes this morning (yesterday). He informed the court that Professor Kanyinsola Ajayi (SAN) had graciously accepted the service of the processes in the open court but needed time to respond.
He therefore pleaded with the court for an adjournment to enable the defendant file his response.
Lead counsel to the defendant, Prof. Ajayi, did not object to the request for an adjournment but however added that all counsel who had been served had filed their preliminary objection.
Justice Tsoho consequently fixed July 5 for hearing of the preliminary objections.
Some stakeholders in Malabu Oil had dragged the federal government, Shell, Agip and seven others to court over the alleged illegal transfer of their stakes in the Oil Prospecting Licence (OPS) 245 otherwise known as Malabu Oil to unauthorised persons.
The stakeholders, which include Malabu oil, Alhaji Mohammed Sani Ahmed and Pecos Energy Limited, as 1st to 3rd plaintiffs respectively in the suit are challenging what it claimed to be illegal divestment of their shares in the OPS 245.
Others sued alongside the federal government and the two giant oil firms are Mr. Kweku Amafegha, Munamuna Seidougha, Amaran Joseph, CAC, AGF, Petroleum Minister, and Department of Petroleum Resources (DPR).
In the suit marked FHC/ABJ/ CS/506/2017 and filed at the Federal High Court Abuja, the plaintiffs are seeking “A declaration that the 2nd and 3rd plaintiffs jointly hold seventy percent (70 percent) shareholding in the equity of the 1st plaintiff.
Critical stakeholders in Malabu Oil and Gas, including Mohammed Sanni Abacha, in a bid to reclaim ownership of the OPL 245 filed a suit against the government at the Federal High Court.
They had alleged that federal government re-allocated the oil block to Shell and Agip without the consent of Malabu oil where they owned the largest shares.
The plaintiffs are further seeking “A declaration that the 2nd and 3rd plaintiffs have never divested themselves of their respective shares in the equity of the 1st plaintiff and continue to be shareholders and Directors of the 1st plaintiff.”
Other prayers the plaintiffs are asking from the court include “A declaration that all the resolutions passed by the purported directors of the 1st plaintiff and all alterations made to the 1st plaintiff’s document in its original file at the 4th defendant’s office which affected and changed the shareholding structure of the 1st plaintiff from 1998 to 2010 being unauthorized, are illegal, null, void and of no effect.
“A declaration that forms CAC 2 and 7 (Statement of Shares Capital and Return of Allotment of Shares) dated 9th June, 2010 prepared and filed by one Ayo Ademola purporting to transfer the 2nd plaintiff’s 10,000,000 shares in the equity of the 1st plaintiff to one Seidougha Munamuna (2nd defendant), the 6,000,000 shares of one Kweku Amafagha (1st defendant) to Amaran Joseph (3rd defendant) and Hindu’s 4,000,000 shares to the same Amaran Joseph is illegal, null and void same having been prepared and filled are without the consent, knowledge and authority of the 2nd and 3rd plaintiffs.
“A declaration that the resolution dated 9th June, 2010 purporting to validate the three (3) Shares Transfer Agreements of the same date, 9th June, 2010 purportedly transferring the shares of the 2nd plaintiff to Seidougha Munamuna (2nd defendant), the shares of Kweku Amafagha (1st defendant) and Hassan Hindu to Joseph Amaran (3rd defendant) are all null and void not having been authorised by the 2nd and 3rd plaintiffs.
Also, the plaintiffs want a declaration that the purported surrender of Malabu oil’s title, right and interest in Oil Prospecting Licence 245 (OPL 245) to the Federal Government of Nigeria under the Malabu Settlement Agreement dated April 29, 2011, whereby the oil company allegedly relinquished all claims to OPL 245 and agreed to all future actions which the Federal Government of Nigeria may take with respect to OPL 245 is null and void, the said surrender having been carried out on behalf of the 1st plaintiff by persons who had no authority to so act.
Furthermore, the plaintiffs are praying for a declaration that the subsequent purported allocation of Malabu oil’s titles, rights and interest in OPL 245 to a consortium of Shell Nigeria Exploration and Production Company Limited (5th defendant, Nigerian Agip Exploration Limited (6th defendant) under a resolution Agreement dated April 30, 2011, is null and void, same having been predicated on the unauthorised surrender of the 1st plaintiff’s interest in same.
- This Day