Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    SweetCrudeReportsSweetCrudeReports
    Subscribe
    • Home
    • Oil
    • Gas
    • Power
    • Solid Minerals
    • Labour
    • Financing
    • Freight
    • Environment
    • Community Development
    • Renewable Energy
    • E-Editions
    SweetCrudeReportsSweetCrudeReports
    Home » BFIG has no claim to ALSCON — BPE

    BFIG has no claim to ALSCON — BPE

    October 15, 2014
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp

    15 October 2014, Abuja – The controversy over the privatisation of Aluminium Smelter Company of Nigeria, ALSCON, Ikot Abasi, Akwa Ibom State, has continued to rage as Bureau of Public Enterprises, PBE, said yesterday, that BFI Group, BFIG, had no basis to lay claim to the company.

    The Federal High Court in Abuja, had on September 30 decided that BFIG was the owner of ALSCON.

     

    BFIG won the original bid for the nation’s only smelter company, but in a twist of high level power-play, the company was given to RUSAL, a company which was publicly disqualified by BPE at the financial bid opening for submitting “a conditional bid.”

    BFIG, therefore, went to court to challenge the action of the Federal Government.

    The case was decided in its favour by the Supreme Court in 2012 after nearly a decade of legal battle.

    However, Rusal and BPE argue that BFIG had failed to comply with the Supreme Court judgment of July 6, 2012, as it had not paid for the company and, therefore, had no right to the shares of the company in question or to ALSCON plant.

    BPE’s spokesman, Mr. Chigbo Anichebe, said in a statement in Abuja, yesterday: “Following various media accounts on the alleged takeover of ALSCON by the BFIG, BPE would like to put on record that it has not handed over ALSCON to BFIG or, for that matter, any other group other than the present managers, RUSAL.

    “It is important to note that BPE only hands over Federal Government assets to those who bid and fully pay the bid consideration. BFIG has not paid a kobo.

    “As a result, BPE’s position has long been that it performed its obligations under the Supreme Court decision of July 6, 2012.

    “But BFIG failed to perform its part of the obligations. The result being, in our opinion, that BFIG has no right to the said shares.

    “The decision of September 30 of the Federal High Court in Abuja in BFIG’s case against BPE to “enforce” the Supreme Court judgment, in our opinion, is in error.”

    “That decision is already a subject of an appeal.”

    – Vanguard

    Related News

    FG commends progress on $400m rare earth processing plant in Nasarawa

    Nigeria secures $3bn mining investments, signals sector growth

    ‘Steel, power sectors must align to drive industrial growth’

    E-book
    Resilience Exhibition

    Latest News

    The risk problem with investors treating African energy as one market

    June 20, 2026

    NNPC pushes regional energy integration, technology for Africa’s growth

    June 20, 2026

    China sets new solar efficiency record with Perovskite breakthrough

    June 20, 2026

    Nigeria must act faster on environmental challenges

    June 20, 2026

    UNDP urges Nigeria to pursue future beyond plastic dependence

    June 20, 2026
    Demo
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    • Opec Daily Basket
    • Oil
    • Power
    • Gas
    • Freight
    • Financing
    • Labour
    • Technology
    • Solid Mineral
    • Conferences/Seminars
    • Community Development
    • Nigerian Content Initiative
    • Niger-Delta Question
    • Insurance
    • Other News
    • Focus
    • Feedback
    • Hanging Out With Markson

    Subscribe for Updates

    Get the latest energy news from Sweetcrudereports.

    Please wait...
    Please enter all required fields Click to hide
    Correct invalid entries Click to hide
    © 2026 Sweetcrudereports.
    • About Us
    • Advertise with us
    • Privacy Policy

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.