Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    SweetCrudeReportsSweetCrudeReports
    Subscribe
    • Home
    • Oil
    • Gas
    • Power
    • Solid Minerals
    • Labour
    • Financing
    • Freight
    • Community Development
    • E-Editions
    SweetCrudeReportsSweetCrudeReports
    Home » Nigeria sues JP Morgan $1.7bn in London over Malabu oil deal

    Nigeria sues JP Morgan $1.7bn in London over Malabu oil deal

    February 23, 2022
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp

    …Trial to end April 7, judgment will take months

    Lagos — Nigeria has instituted a $1.7 billion suit against U.S. bank JP Morgan Chase at a high court in London over oil deal.

    The London high court began on Wednesday to hear the lawsuit, in which Nigeria is claiming more than $1.7 billion for the U.S. bank’s role in a disputed 2011 oilfield deal.

    According to Reuters, the civil suit filed in the English courts relates to the purchase by energy majors Shell and Eni of the offshore OPL 245 oilfield in Nigeria, which is also at the centre of ongoing legal action in Italy.

    A panel of judges in Milan acquitted the companies and executives, who all denied any wrongdoing, of bribery last March. Prosecutors have appealed the ruling.

    In the court documents pertaining to the London case, quoted by Reuters, Nigeria alleges JP Morgan was “grossly negligent” in its decision to transfer funds paid by the energy majors into an escrow account to a company controlled by the country’s former oil minister Dan Etete instead of into government coffers.

    The trial opened with details of the claim by Nigeria’s lawyer, Roger Masefield. JP Morgan will present its defence early next week. The trial will end on April 7 and a judgment will likely take several months.

    In court, Masefield said Nigeria’s case rested on proving two key points: there was a fraud and JP Morgan was aware of the risk of fraud. He said JP Morgan had breached its duties.

    “The evidence of fraud is little short of overwhelming,” Masefield told the court.

    “Under its Quincecare duty, the bank was entitled to refuse to pay for as long as it had reasonable grounds for believing its customer was being defrauded,” he was also quoted as saying.

    Quincecare is a legal precedent whereby the bank should not pay out if it believes its client will be defrauded by making the payment.

    JP Morgan’s London offices deal with business for Europe, Middle East and Africa, including Nigeria.

    A spokesman for the bank in a statement, cited by Reuters, said it was “confident that it acted appropriately in making these payments” and said the bank would “robustly defend against this claim”.

    The damages sought include cash sent to Etete’s company Malabu Oil and Gas, around $875 million paid in three instalments in 2011 and 2013, plus interest, taking the total to over $1.7 billion. The Nigerian government at the time asked JP Morgan to make these transfers as part of the oilfield sale, court documents show.

    The London case dates back to 1998 when Nigerian military ruler Sani Abacha awarded the offshore oilfield licence, OPL 245, to a company Etete owned.

    The $20 million price tag – of which Etete paid about $2 million, according to court documents – was widely viewed by industry experts as too low given the block was expected to yield billions of dollars of crude, although it remains undeveloped.

    Subsequent Nigerian administrations contested Etete’s rights to the field, triggering years of legal wrangling until a deal designed to end the battles was struck in 2011.

    Etete’s company Malabu Oil and Gas handed the undeveloped OPL 245 back to Nigeria as part of a resolution agreement involving Shell and Eni.

    To complete the deal, Shell and Eni paid a signature bonus of about $200 million directly to the Nigerian government and then deposited $1.1 billion in the Nigerian government’s escrow account with JP Morgan, court documents show.

    Etete’s lawyers did not comment on the trial as Etete is not a party in this suit. Shell and Eni are also not parties to the London law suit and declined to comment.

    Follow us on twitter

     

     

    Related News

    Renaissance surpasses oil output target by 40% in first month

    Aramco signs up to $90bn in US deals as Trump’s Gulf tour spurs flurry of tie-ups

    Asharami Synergy drives innovation, customer-centric fuelling solutions in aviation

    Comments are closed.

    E-book
    Resilience Exhibition

    Latest News

    Gold faces weekly loss as trade optimism reduces safe-haven demand

    May 16, 2025

    Renaissance surpasses oil output target by 40% in first month

    May 16, 2025

    Ogbuku okays legal drive to tackle Niger Delta challenges

    May 16, 2025

    President Tinubu charts a new course for Nigeria’s tax system

    May 16, 2025

    Indorama sets gold standard for privatisation as veteran spokesman bows out

    May 16, 2025
    Demo
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    • Opec Daily Basket
    • Oil
    • Power
    • Gas
    • Freight
    • Financing
    • Labour
    • Technology
    • Solid Mineral
    • Conferences/Seminars
    • Community Development
    • Nigerian Content Initiative
    • Niger-Delta Question
    • Insurance
    • Other News
    • Focus
    • Feedback
    • Hanging Out With Markson

    Subscribe for Updates

    Get the latest energy news from Sweetcrudereports.

    Please wait...
    Please enter all required fields Click to hide
    Correct invalid entries Click to hide
    © 2025 Sweetcrudereports.
    • About Us
    • Advertise with us
    • Privacy Policy

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.