Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    SweetCrudeReportsSweetCrudeReports
    Subscribe
    • Home
    • Oil
    • Gas
    • Power
    • Solid Minerals
    • Labour
    • Financing
    • Freight
    • Environment
    • Community Development
    • Renewable Energy
    • E-Editions
    SweetCrudeReportsSweetCrudeReports
    Home » ‘Bayelsa not planning to annex five oil-rich Kalabari communities’

    ‘Bayelsa not planning to annex five oil-rich Kalabari communities’

    October 31, 2012
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp

    Samuel Oyadongha

    31 0ctober 2012, Sweetcrude, YENAGOA – BAYELSA State Government has described as misleading, claims that it was planning to annex five oil rich communities in Kalabari Kingdom in Rivers State and called on the later to tender an unreserved apology to the state and President Goodluck Jonathan over the unguarded, and mischievous statements, aimed at disparaging the Presidency and inciting violence between the sister states.

    This came as the Presidency, last night, dissociated President Goodluck Jonathan from the border dispute between both states.

    Kalabari National Forum had, Monday, protested alleged surreptitious moves by some federal government officials to excise 5 oil producing Kalabari communities of Rivers States and give them to Bayelsa State for political reasons.

    Bayelsa dismisses claims
    But, the Bayelsa State Government, in a statement by the Chief Press Secretary to the Governor, Mr. Daniel Iworiso-Markson, dismissed the alleged move to forcefully annex any territory or people to Bayelsa, saying that Ijaw strategic interest demanded that Ijaws wherever they were, should be supported and strengthened and not forced into Bayelsa State.

    It described the purported claim as an attempt by detractors of the Ijaw nation to create unnecessary strife and hostility within the Ijaw ethnic family to the collective disadvantage of the Ijaw nation.

    The statement which was issued last night in Yenagoa, read: “The attention of Bayelsa State Government has been drawn to media reports credited to chiefs and elders of some Ijaw clans of Kalabari extraction in Rivers State, alleging attempts by some persons to forcefully annex communities and ancestral lands as well as oil facilities and installations in Kalabariland to Bayelsa State for the purpose of claiming derivation entitlements.

    No such move
    “The government of Bayelsa State wishes to react as follows: Firstly, we assure our Ijaw kith and kin in the Kalabari clan of Rivers State that there is no such move to forcefully annex any territory or people into Bayelsa State. We further wish to state that the Ijaw strategic interest demands that Ijaws wherever they are should be supported and strengthened and not to be forced into Bayelsa State.

    “That the purported claim is an attempt by detractors of the Ijaw nation to create unnecessary strife and hostility within the Ijaw ethnic family to our collective disadvantage.

    Presidency dissociates Jonathan from imbroglio
    Meanwhile, the Presidency has dissociated President Goodluck Jonathan from the imbroglio, saying attempt to involve him smacked of irresponsibility.

    The Presidency said in a statement: “Our attention has been drawn to a publication in some newspapers today about a protest staged by the Kalabari National Forum and some monarchs in Abuja, in which the so-called protesters accused President Goodluck Ebele Jonathan of interfering in a boundary dispute between Rivers and Bayelsa states.

    “The protesters alleged directly and through innuendoes, that there are plans to ‘cede five Rivers State oil communities to Bayelsa with the connivance of various Federal Government agencies under the watchful eyes and supervision of his Excellency, Mr. President whose home state, most ingloriously, is the direct beneficiary.’

    “We consider these allegations irresponsible and most unfortunate considering the status of the persons who reportedly championed the protest. The statutory agencies being referred to by the protesters do not take orders from the President; they are independent bodies. Besides, there are laid down procedures for resolving inter-state boundary disputes.

    “In this particular case, the dispute between Rivers and Bayelsa states predates the Jonathan administration, and has been a matter for consideration by the National Boundary Commission, the Revenue Mobilisation Allocation and Fiscal Commission (RMAFC) and other relevant agencies, long before now.”

    Related News

    US praises Nigeria’s CNG push, urges wider adoption

    IEA sees significant 2027 oil surplus after Hormuz recovery

    Nigeria’s domestic gas sales jump as production nears 8bcf/d

    E-book
    Resilience Exhibition

    Latest News

    The risk problem with investors treating African energy as one market

    June 20, 2026

    NNPC pushes regional energy integration, technology for Africa’s growth

    June 20, 2026

    China sets new solar efficiency record with Perovskite breakthrough

    June 20, 2026

    Nigeria must act faster on environmental challenges

    June 20, 2026

    UNDP urges Nigeria to pursue future beyond plastic dependence

    June 20, 2026
    Demo
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    • Opec Daily Basket
    • Oil
    • Power
    • Gas
    • Freight
    • Financing
    • Labour
    • Technology
    • Solid Mineral
    • Conferences/Seminars
    • Community Development
    • Nigerian Content Initiative
    • Niger-Delta Question
    • Insurance
    • Other News
    • Focus
    • Feedback
    • Hanging Out With Markson

    Subscribe for Updates

    Get the latest energy news from Sweetcrudereports.

    Please wait...
    Please enter all required fields Click to hide
    Correct invalid entries Click to hide
    © 2026 Sweetcrudereports.
    • About Us
    • Advertise with us
    • Privacy Policy

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.