Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    SweetCrudeReportsSweetCrudeReports
    Subscribe
    • Home
    • Oil
    • Gas
    • Power
    • Solid Minerals
    • Labour
    • Financing
    • Freight
    • Environment
    • Community Development
    • Renewable Energy
    • E-Editions
    SweetCrudeReportsSweetCrudeReports
    Home » Fracking ban would cost US almost 15 million jobs by 2022

    Fracking ban would cost US almost 15 million jobs by 2022

    November 5, 2016
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp
    *hydraulic fracturing .
    *Hydraulic fracturing .

    05 November 2016, Houston — If an outright ban on hydraulic fracturing began the first of 2017, it would cost the United States 14.8 million jobs by 2022, according to a new report by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce Institute for 21st Century Energy.

    The report explores outcomes of the hypothetical ban and directly calls out fracking ban proponent Senator Bernie Sanders as well as Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton (who is in favor of local regulations), suggesting they as well as their constituents, “may choose to ignore the economic impacts” of a fracking ban.

    The oil-rich states of Colorado, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Texas would be hardest hit. The study said by 2022, Colorado would lose 215,000 jobs; Ohio 397,000 jobs, Pennsylvania 466,000 jobs and Texas 1.49 million jobs.

    In addition to job loss, banning fracking would contribute to an almost doubling of gasoline prices (53 percent more in 2017), skyrocketing natural gas prices and a $1.6 trillion GDP decline by 2022, the report finds.

    “Without fracking, the U.S. could surrender our status as a global energy superpower,” Karen Harbert, president and CEO of the US Chamber’s Institute for 21st Century Energy, stated in a release. “Every American family could face higher prices for the energy they consume and the products and services they buy, and almost 15 million Americans could be out of work.”

    The report was released just days before one of the most-talked about presidential elections in U.S. history. Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton has advocated for a clean energy climate through tougher environmental protections and more renewables while Republican nominee Donald Trump has said his energy plan will add $100 billion to the economy and create 500,000 jobs each year.

    *Valerie Jones – Rigzone

    Related News

    NADDC commissions automotive training centre in Zamfara, graduates 100 youths

    Nigeria, World Bank strengthen partnership to build capacity of institutional workforce

    PTDF, Air Force Institute deepen partnership on energy skills

    E-book
    Resilience Exhibition

    Latest News

    FG commends progress on $400m rare earth processing plant in Nasarawa

    June 21, 2026

    NNPC pushes regional energy integration, technology for Africa’s growth

    June 21, 2026

    Clean energy investment surges to $2.2 trillion, outpacing fossil fuels

    June 21, 2026

    Nigeria secures $3bn mining investments, signals sector growth

    June 21, 2026

    US praises Nigeria’s CNG push, urges wider adoption

    June 21, 2026
    Demo
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    • Opec Daily Basket
    • Oil
    • Power
    • Gas
    • Freight
    • Financing
    • Labour
    • Technology
    • Solid Mineral
    • Conferences/Seminars
    • Community Development
    • Nigerian Content Initiative
    • Niger-Delta Question
    • Insurance
    • Other News
    • Focus
    • Feedback
    • Hanging Out With Markson

    Subscribe for Updates

    Get the latest energy news from Sweetcrudereports.

    Please wait...
    Please enter all required fields Click to hide
    Correct invalid entries Click to hide
    © 2026 Sweetcrudereports.
    • About Us
    • Advertise with us
    • Privacy Policy

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.