Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    SweetCrudeReportsSweetCrudeReports
    Subscribe
    • Home
    • Oil
    • Gas
    • Power
    • Solid Minerals
    • Labour
    • Financing
    • Freight
    • Environment
    • Community Development
    • Renewable Energy
    • E-Editions
    SweetCrudeReportsSweetCrudeReports
    Home » Iraq, Afghanistan: US Court rejects KBR, Halliburton appeals

    Iraq, Afghanistan: US Court rejects KBR, Halliburton appeals

    January 20, 2015
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp

    20 January 2015, News Wires – The US Supreme Court has allowed lawsuits to move forward against government contractors in Iraq and Afghanistan by declining to hear appeals filed by KBR and Halliburton.

    HalliburtonThe high court left intact appeals court rulings against the two companies in three different cases, Reuters reported.

    One lawsuit was brought by the family of US Staff Sergeant Ryan Maseth, who died in 2008 after being electrocuted in his barracks in Iraq. The family says KBR was negligent in servicing the barracks plumbing.

    The second case centred on accusations that the two companies harmed thousands of service members and contractor employees in Iraq and Afghanistan by burning hazardous waste, including asbestos and human remains, in open-air pits. The alleged victims say in 58 consolidated suits that they were exposed to toxic smoke and contaminated water, according to Bloomberg.

    The third case involves allegations that KBR was to blame for soldiers’ exposure to a potentially dangerous chemical, sodium dichromate, while repairing the Qarmat Ali water treatment facility in southern Iraq.

    There are a series of cases against private contractors concerning their liability for actions that took place in Iraq and Afghanistan. Plaintiffs sue companies because the US military generally cannot be sued over such issues. Courts have struggled over whether to allow the lawsuits to proceed.

    KBR was part of Halliburton until it was spun off in 2007. The plaintiffs say they were injured because the companies did not follow correct procedures.

    Both companies say they should not be liable, in part due to their unique role as contractors for the military in sensitive situations overseas.

    The cases are KBR v. Harris, KBR v. Metzgar and KBR v. McManaway US Supreme Court, No. 13-817, No. 13-1241 and No. 14-105.

     

    – Upstream

    Related News

    NNPC uncovers rising pipeline theft, records 24 cases in 18 months

    Nigeria targets 2.5million barrels daily as investment surges

    Global SMR capacity to surge nearly sixfold during 2025-30

    E-book
    Resilience Exhibition

    Latest News

    NNPC uncovers rising pipeline theft, records 24 cases in 18 months

    June 12, 2026

    Nigeria moves to unlock 209TCF gas wealth through local utilisation drive

    June 12, 2026

    EFCC uncovers N4.4bn gold smuggling ring in Kano

    June 12, 2026

    Mambilla power fraud: Witness explains FEC document certification dispute

    June 12, 2026

    Obi queries Tinubu’s borrowing spree despite revenue doubling

    June 12, 2026
    Demo
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    • Opec Daily Basket
    • Oil
    • Power
    • Gas
    • Freight
    • Financing
    • Labour
    • Technology
    • Solid Mineral
    • Conferences/Seminars
    • Community Development
    • Nigerian Content Initiative
    • Niger-Delta Question
    • Insurance
    • Other News
    • Focus
    • Feedback
    • Hanging Out With Markson

    Subscribe for Updates

    Get the latest energy news from Sweetcrudereports.

    Please wait...
    Please enter all required fields Click to hide
    Correct invalid entries Click to hide
    © 2026 Sweetcrudereports.
    • About Us
    • Advertise with us
    • Privacy Policy

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.